很多雅思考生都有這樣的問題，即正式雅思閱讀考試過程中三篇文章一般那篇更難，今天小編給大家帶來了雅思考試臨場經驗之閱讀先做哪一篇，希望能幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
雅思考試臨場經驗之閱讀先做哪一篇
其實，分析認為，作為一種國際性的考試，雅思考試的閱讀并沒有那么多的“玄學”，由于每套題目都遵循一個標準出爐，意味著經過Testing Panel驗證后合格的考題總體上應該是在一個難度水平線上的。我們完全沒有必要在這點上大做文章。但為何有的考生言之鑿鑿地聲稱確實某一篇比其他的更難呢?
筆者認為，中國考生由于不是將英語作為native language，那么在詞匯、閱讀能力、速度有限的情況下，文章主題的熟悉度和背景知識的多寡直接就會造成考生對于特定考試文章的難度主觀感覺，這其實也解釋了為什么對于同一次考試，同一篇文章，英語水平其實差異不大的不同幾個考生會對文章難度有著迥然不同的看法。這種現象其實在網絡回憶文字中屢見不鮮。
所以，更理性的一種做法是，一方面考試要正視考題的客觀難度穩定性，另一方面又要積極地采取方式避免或至少減小文章的主觀難度的負面影響。老師建議：
考生在接到考場指令打開試卷的第一時間用最短的時間(盡量不超過一分鐘)skim全卷
結合總體印象、最明顯的重復用詞，以及可能會有的全文標題、段落/小節標題、插圖等所有可借助的信息
按照個人對主題的熟悉度、感興趣的程度重新安排全卷的先后做題順序
這樣處理后，該次考試的Passage 1/2/3就不再是考生手中question booklet所標明的順序，而是“主觀上”對該考生而言，按照難度系數遞增的順序排列的Passage 1/2/3，而先完成的就是考生感覺最有信心，最“親切”的文章，也就是“最簡單”的文章。
請注意，在雅思考試這樣的時間和題量設置框架下，大部分考生的考場心理狀態極大程度上影響了最終水平發揮的結果。因此建議考生在考前綜合模擬測試中，在對完整一套題目的總體解題sequencing方面，不妨實踐和熟悉這樣的操作，以在未來實際考試中有一個更好的starting point。
必須指出，本文所討論的問題是針對Academic Reading而言的。對于General Training Reading，由于其三個Section中前兩個都只是幾篇短文，而第三個是類同Academic Reading的長文，明顯存在著閱讀量和難度的差異，所以一般而言不存在section之間重新sequencing的問題。
雅思考試閱讀理解模擬測試題及答案
Next Year Marks the EU's 50th Anniversary of the Treaty
A. After a period of introversion and stunned self-disbelief, continental European governments will recover their enthusiasm for pan-European institution-building in 2007. Whether the European public will welcome a return to what voters in two countries had rejected so short a time before is another matter.
B. There are several reasons for Europe's recovering self-confidence. For years European economies had been lagging dismally behind America (to say nothing of Asia), but in 2006 the large continental economies had one of their best years for a decade, briefly outstripping America in terms of growth. Since politics often reacts to economic change with a lag, 2006's improvement in economic growth will have its impact in 2007, though the recovery may be ebbing by then.
C. The coming year also marks a particular point in a political cycle so regular that it almost seems to amount to a natural law. Every four or five years, European countries take a large stride towards further integration by signing a new treaty: the Maastricht treaty in 1992, the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1997, the Treaty of Nice in 2001. And in 2005 they were supposed to ratify a European constitution, laying the ground for yet more integration—until the calm rhythm was rudely shattered by French and Dutch voters. But the political impetus to sign something every four or five years has only been interrupted, not immobilised, by this setback.
D. In 2007 the European Union marks the 50th anniversary of another treaty—the Treaty of Rome, its founding charter. Government leaders have already agreed to celebrate it ceremoniously, restating their commitment to "ever closer union" and the basic ideals of European unity. By itself, and in normal circumstances, the EU's 50th-birthday greeting to itself would be fairly meaningless, a routine expression of European good fellowship. But it does not take a Machiavelli to spot that once governments have signed the declaration (and it seems unlikely anyone would be so uncollegiate as to veto it) they will already be halfway towards committing themselves to a new treaty. All that will be necessary will be to incorporate the 50th-anniversary declaration into a new treaty containing a number of institutional and other reforms extracted from the failed attempt at constitution-building and—hey presto—a new quasi-constitution will be ready.
E. According to the German government—which holds the EU's agenda-setting presidency during the first half of 2007—there will be a new draft of a slimmed-down constitution ready by the middle of the year, perhaps to put to voters, perhaps not. There would then be a couple of years in which it will be discussed, approved by parliaments and, perhaps, put to voters if that is deemed unavoidable. Then, according to bureaucratic planners in Brussels and Berlin, blithely ignoring the possibility of public rejection, the whole thing will be signed, sealed and a new constitution delivered in 2009-10. Europe will be nicely back on schedule. Its four-to-five-year cycle of integration will have missed only one beat.
F. The resurrection of the European constitution will be made more likely in 2007 because of what is happening in national capitals. The European Union is not really an autonomous organisation. If it functions, it is because the leaders of the big continental countries want it to, reckoning that an active European policy will help them get done what they want to do in their own countries.
G. That did not happen in 2005-06. Defensive, cynical and self-destructive, the leaders of the three largest euro-zone countries—France, Italy and Germany—were stumbling towards their unlamented ends. They saw no reason to pursue any sort of European policy and the EU, as a result, barely functioned. But by the middle of 2007 all three will have gone, and this fact alone will transform the European political landscape.
H. The upshot is that the politics of the three large continental countries, bureaucraticmomentum and the economics of recovery will all be aligned to give a push towards integration in 2007. That does not mean the momentum will be irresistible or even popular. The British government, for one, will almost certainly not want to go with the flow, beginning yet another chapter in the long history of confrontation between Britain and the rest of Europe. More important, the voters will want a say. They rejected the constitution in 2005. It would be foolish to assume they will accept it after 2007 just as a result of an artful bit of tinkering.
Questions 1-6 Do the following statemets reflect the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 1?
Write your answer in Boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet.
TRUE if the statemenht reflets the claims of the writer
FALSE if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is possbile to say what the writer thinks about this
1. After years' introspection and mistrust, continental European governments will resurrect their enthusiasm for more integration in 2007.
2. The European consitution was officially approved in 2005 in spite of the oppositon of French and Dutch voters.
3. The Treaty of Rome , which is considered as the fundamental charter of the European Union, was signed in 1957.
4. It is very unlikely that European countries will sign the declaration at the 50th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome.
5. French government will hold the EU's presidency and lay down the agenda during the first half of 2008.
6. For a long time in hisotry, there has been confrontation between Britain and the rest of European countries.
雅思考試閱讀理解預測試題及答案
In the earliest stages of man's development he had no more need of money than animals have. He was content with very simple forms of shelter, made his own rough tools and weapons and could provide food and clothing for himself and his family from natural materials around him. As he became more civilized, however, he began to want better shelter, more efficient tools and weapons, and more comfortable and more lasting clothing than could be provided by his own neighborhood or by the work of his own unskilled hands. For these things he had to turn to the skilled people such as smiths, leather workers or carpenters. It was then that the question of payment arose.
At first he got what he wanted by a simple process of exchange. The smith who had not the time to look after land or cattle was glad to take meat or grain from the farmer in exchange for an axe or a plough. But as more and more goods which had no fixed exchange value came on the market, exchange became too complicated to be satisfactory. Another problem arose when those who made things wanted to get stocks of wood or leather, or iron, but had nothing to offer in exchange until their finished goods were ready.
Thus the difficulties of exchange led by degrees to the invention of money. In some countries easily handled things like seeds or shells were given a certain value and the farmer, instead of paying the smith for a new axe by giving him some meat or grain, gave him so many shells. If the smith had any shells left when he had bought his food, he could get stocks of the raw materials of his trade. In some countries quite large things such as cows or camels or even big flat stones were used for trade. Later, pieces of metal, bearing values according to the rarity of the metal and the size of the pieces, or coins were used. Money as we know it had arrived.
1. Exchange of goods became difficult because _________.
A man became more civilized
B smiths began to look after land or cattle in their spare time
C more and more goods which had no fixed exchange values came to the marker
D farmers hadn't enough grain or meat to provide for skilled workers
2. Money was not used until _______.
A paper was invented
B people practiced a simple process of exchange
C nothing could be offered in exchange
D the exchange of one thing for another became too complicated
3. The best title for this passage is _____.
A What is money
B What are money's functions.
C The importance of money
D The beginning of money
注釋：
1. stage 階段;時期at an early stage in our history
在我們的歷史早期
(前面與the連用)演員生涯;劇院工作;戲劇工作 行程，旅程
to travel by easy stages 從容旅行
2. content n.內容，容量，目錄，滿足adj.滿足的， 滿意的， 愿意vt.使滿足
We should never content ourselves with a little book knowledge only. 我們切不可滿足于僅僅有一點點書本知識。
3. shelter n.掩蔽處，身避處，掩蔽，保護，庇護所，掩體v.掩蔽，躲避
He stood in the shelter at the bus stop. 他站在公共汽車站的候車亭里。
4. smith n.鐵匠，金屬品工匠
leather n.皮革，皮革制品
carpenter n.木匠
5. axe or plough 斧或犁
6 complicate 使復雜化，使錯綜加重(疾病)使混亂，難做、難懂;使惡化
be complicated in 卷入……(的麻煩中)
Don't complicate life for me! 不要為我把生活搞復雜了!
答案：1 C 2 D 3 D
雅思考試臨場經驗之閱讀先做哪一篇相關文章：
★ 雅思口語考試臨場發揮的一點建議
★ 雅思寫作滿分的3點經驗分享
