如何從評分標準入手備考GRE寫作

如何從評分標準入手備考GRE寫作,我們一起來看看吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

如何從評分標準入手備考GRE寫作

GRE寫作滿分要點解析，主要包括以下四點：

1、迎合GRE考試評卷人的評卷思路：

每個評卷人對你文章的評閱非常快，不可能對每個細節都很仔細地去看。考生應該迎合評卷人的評卷思路，用最規范的結構和最清晰的表達來體現自己的思路：首段要鮮明地提出觀點，中間段落層次要拉開，每段的開始應該就是該段的topic sentence。

2、熟練掌握新GRE寫作題庫：

為了達到公平，ETS公布了它考試的所有寫作題庫，那么為了達到能和native speaker一起競爭，考生應該在考前對所有題目都進行預習(節約考試時的審題時間)，并通過100-150個提綱的寫作了解GRE寫作的一般結構，通過30-50篇寫作來練習自己的寫作思路和表達。對題庫中的題目越熟練，對考試越有利。

3. 新GRE寫作評分注重三方面

首先，從ETS公布的各分數段評分標準看，其評分主要注重以下三個方面：①、邏輯分析能力(要求insightful);②、文章的組織(要求well-organized);③、語言能力(要求standard written English; concise; varied structure等)。

4. 盡量提高AI部分的寫作能力而力保AA部分滿分

由于AA的寫作不牽涉自己觀點的展開，只須指出作者邏輯上的漏洞，因此在經過訓練以后，寫起來并不困難;而AI的寫作需要自己展開自己設立的觀點，不但需要邏輯上的洞察能力，還需要論證觀點的能力，語言組織的能力，因此對于中國考生來講比較困難，難以短期內有較大提高。

但是這兩個部分在總分中的權重是一樣的，因此考生的策略應該是盡量提高AI部分的寫作能力而力保AA部分滿分(或高分)。因為如果AA部分滿分的話，AI部分只需爭取在4分以上就可以保證整體作文分數在5分以上。

GRE issue寫作優秀實例：錢是否花在當下

題目：

"It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term research that might help future generations."

與其花錢進行可能有助于后代的長期性研究，還不如把錢花在迫在眉睫，已經存在的社會問題上。

正文：

In this contradictory era of pleasure and pain, loyalty and treachery, joy of life and fearof future, which arise a considerable of problems government has been bored by. No matter how serious and urgent one aspect turns out to be in a certain period,government is supposed to call for a balance between allocating money for immediateproblems and spending it on long-term research when making budget.

To be responsible for current citizens, government should solve those existing socialproblems, such as unemployment, illiteracy, and social crimes, in order to oil the socialmachine. To some extent, increasing the amount of jobs may get more benefit thanitself, because it is a way to release social pressure and dissatisfaction of thoseunemployed workers who may eventually become a ticklish factor to society.

Additionally, illiteracy is to society as the shortest baffle is to a cask. And it could donothing but lengthen the shortest baffle to the same length as the other baffles if morewater is supposed to be poured in this cask. As a malignant tumor, social crimes do harm to the economy and security of our society and, in some cases, is a potential fuse especially when there is an internal or external opposition to the government, so, to keep society stabilized and booming, government has to pay more attention to social crimes.

If not, citizens may feel under peril and lose confidence to the ruling class. As a result, for saving money, the government is bogged down in Sargasso Sea of troubles.Nonetheless, the governors are not born only for today’s people. That is to say,another significant and meaningful responsibility of government is to try its best to supply our posterity a society that consists of people who are well educated and obtain a desirable job or career, less juvenile crime and drug, and stable economy. As

H.W.Beecher pointed, “We should so live and labor in our time that what came to us as seed may go to the next generation as blossom, and what came to us as blossom may go to them as fruit. This is what we mean by progress.”It is true that long-term research could not give out an immediate value, for example,how to afforest a wasteland, but we shouldn’t be so narrow foci and misprize the real value normally coming up in about decades or more. “Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards”, said by Kierkergaard. The phrase “be lived forwards” here, in this case, means digging out the profit in future, the same as futures. Although no one knows whether or not the future is in concord with what we expect, we still could invest in it based on a pile of wide investigation and a cogent demonstration rather than a gambling.

Simply put, without spending money on immediate and existing social problems, our society cannot keep flourish and robust. Without investing on so many long-term researches, we will live no guarantees and aimless. Therefore, to ensure the stability and health as well as lasting development of our society, spending money on immediate social problems and investing on long-term researches weigh the same.

GRE issue寫作優秀實例：競爭利弊問題

題目： "Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society."

歸根結底，競爭對于社會是利多弊少。

正文：

Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.

First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of "weak" genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.

Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.

Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.

While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as "Missed A here"whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.

That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to "stream line" their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this "stream line" process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.

In politics, the detrimental effects of competition are blatant. Politicians often resort to popular yet socially damaging policies to gain votes. These measures include imprudent spending to rabble rousing. The current volatility in Israel and Palestine, the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, and the famine in Zimbabwe are all, at least partially, problems created by politicians to get elected.

It has been said that education is one sphere where competition has always had a beneficial influence. Even this claim is dubious. Due to competition students are less likely to exchange ideas with one another, thus enriching the student population as whole. Furthermore, competition drives students to study well to pass exams, but not to gain wisdom. Students spend many hours preparing for standardised tests; tests which many believe are inherently flawed. Thus, it is often not the most intellectual student who succeeds, but the most competitive.

Competition is an inborn human trait. It has some positive qualities, but overall, it does far more harm than help to the society. As intelligent beings, humans can transcend their evolutionary weaknesses. Thus, humans should rely less competition and more cooperation for the sake of the society.

如何從評分標準入手備考GRE寫作相關文章：